aircooled wrote:
Woody wrote:
I was buying parts at the Jeep dealership one day when one parts guy said to the other "Why do these things hold their value so well? There's nothing to them!".
That, and:
- go out and buy a, lets say (20 year old) 1990 Wrangler in good condition,
- drive it to a Jeep dealership
- park it next to a new one
- compare
There is almost no difference! If the new ones are almost the same as the old ones, and old one in good condition will be worth a lot. Poor condition ones of course are easy to fix as noted above.
This might come as a shock of humongous proportions to the GRM community, but I'm going to chime in here. In the general sense, no, the Wrangler hasn't evolved a whole lot, especially YJ to TJ. But some differences:
From YJ to TJ:
TJ had stronger frame and body. TJ was coil sprung, YJ had leafs all around. Some YJ Sixers were 4.2Ls, the early ones, including the '90 example (my bro-in-law had a '90). The 4.2L is a good engine, nothing to really complain about, although the 4.0L that came in later YJs and all 6-cylinder TJs is better (an improved 4.2L really). Avoid the Peugeot BA-10 on those earlier YJs.
The JK changed quite a bit. The 4.0L I6 was replaced by the 3.8L V6. It was an emissions thing. The 4.0L has the torque down lower where you need it, it's a legend for it's reliability and durability. The V6 isn't really. Basically, the newer, smoother 3.8L V6 was a perfect fit for the huge majority that never leave the pavement, while I'd take the 4.0L I6 every time. The JK got wider, too. Power locks, power windows, power all kinds of stuff, stability control, traction control. Control, control, control. Everything is run through computers on the JK, and it's higher-tech approach has earned it more than a couple software-related recalls. The JK isn't really doing anything to convince me my "it's more reliable when you leave out the fancy electronic gizmos off of it" opinion. It's a personal thing, although I prefer my lower-tech TJ.
"But this is HDTV. It's got better resolution than the real world."