Forums » Off-topic discussion » Has fuel economy influenced your "fun" car purchases? « 1 2 »
  • Racer1ab

    April 5, 2011 4:05 p.m. Racer1ab Reader

    I'm on the verge of selling my old '94 Mustang GT tracker, and am having a hard time deciding between an '01 Bullitt Mustang (prices are actually becoming reasonable, now) or picking up another Miata, since I really miss my old supercharged '95.

    Just curious how you folks rationalize fuel economy vs. fun.

    And yeah, I realize the proper answer is either another forced induction Miata, or some form of LS1 swap.

  • 1988RedT2

    April 5, 2011 4:07 p.m. 1988RedT2 Dork

    Given that my fun car is a turbo rotary RX-7, fuel economy had no influence whatsoever on my choice.

  • Maroon92

    April 5, 2011 4:11 p.m. Maroon92 SuperDork

    Fuel economy has almost never been a consideration for me. That said, I currently daily ride a bike that gets over 60MPG (though I use Motul 2 cycle, so the savings are kind of a wash...)

    I have only used 30 gallons of fuel since October...

    XBL GamerTag: bcbrownell Racing is the process of turning money into noise.

  • DILYSI Dave

    April 5, 2011 4:13 p.m. DILYSI Dave SuperDork

    I'm going to have a hard time not buying my '05+ Mustang if prices hit $5/gallon and people start dumping them for sub-$10k.

  • Duke

    April 5, 2011 4:26 p.m. Duke SuperDork

    Racer1ab wrote: And yeah, I realize the proper answer is either another forced induction Miata...

    Mine doesn't get all that great a fuel economy. Sure is fun, though.

    I can't say that gas prices have influenced my "fun" decisions a bit. I do try to buy DDs that get in the mid-20s per gallon, at least. That's got a much bigger cost to both environment and wallet.

    Junior Brown is my hero.

  • Ranger50

    April 5, 2011 4:26 p.m. Ranger50 HalfDork

    Nope.... gotta have a "fun car" first. If I had a choice though, a new Mustang GT fits the bill nicely, as my old 89GT could get 30mpg if I was easy on it, aka-cruise control. Much better then the current 18mpg I am getting with my v6 dakota.

    "Never trust an intelligent man with no money to play fair."

  • keethrax

    April 5, 2011 4:33 p.m. keethrax Reader

    If they do it's in the "gas prices are expensive so gas guzzling fun cars are cheap so I should buy one" direction. I have practical car(s) why worry about how much an occasional use car drinks.

    Now if I were shopping fora fun car to drive all the time, then maybe it would matter. But maybe not if the purchase price was driven down by gas prices.

    '08 Mazdaspeed3, '00 PontiacGrand Prix GT, '96 Cherokee

  • RexSeven

    April 5, 2011 4:39 p.m. RexSeven Dork

    1988RedT2 wrote: Given that my fun car is a turbo rotary RX-7, fuel economy had no influence whatsoever on my choice.

    Ditto. I still have my N/A FC as well, so that's a double-whammy, and the Speed3 only takes premium, so that's a triple-whammy!

    In all seriousness, though, I don't take fuel economy into consideration for a toy. Economy is what the DD is for. I do want my toy to be somewhat reliable, though, in case the DD needs heavy maintenance.

    The "oh, E36 M3!" handle is above and to the right of your head. In case of an emergency, stick your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye.

  • ReverendDexter

    April 5, 2011 4:51 p.m. ReverendDexter SuperDork

    No thought to it whatsoever. The only things that would get so atrocious of fuel economy are things I wouldn't want in the first place, like a big-block drag car (a big-block full-size wagon? I'm all over it, lol)

    --There is no turd more polished than the Ford Mustang--

  • DeadSkunk

    April 5, 2011 5:07 p.m. DeadSkunk HalfDork

    Yep. Both the Miata and the CooperS were given consideration because of fun factor AND gas mileage.

    '99 Miata,'03 CooperS,'91 GTI 16V, '96 Astro,06 Scion Xb

  • carguy123

    April 5, 2011 5:09 p.m. carguy123 SuperDork

    Not one bit.

    Fun car is for fun, not gas mileage. It does affect my DD thoughts tho.

    Also premium vs. regular!!

    "mobilito ergo sum" I drive therefore I am!

  • BoxheadTim

    April 5, 2011 5:12 p.m. BoxheadTim SuperDork

    Fortunately my 'fun' cars seem to be fairly good on fuel anyway, so fuel economy doesn't influence the decision that much.

    Sanity is vastly overrated.

  • HiTempguy

    April 5, 2011 5:41 p.m. HiTempguy Dork

    Gas just spiked here to $1.15/L ($4.30/gallon, if we say close enough on the exchange rate) and I just bought a car that will struggle to do 20USmpg in the city and maybe 27 tops on the highway... AND takes premium! I place a LOT of importance on those 15 minutes to and from work, I might as well make them count!

    Rallying; It's like skydiving, except you have to dodge trees on your way down!

  • artyboy619

    April 5, 2011 6:02 p.m. artyboy619 New Reader

    my "fun cars" have been free, traded or bartered, so i can't be that picky

  • ditchdigger

    April 5, 2011 6:16 p.m. ditchdigger HalfDork

    Fuel economy had no bearing at all when I bought and built mine but I cannot say I am not enjoying the near 50mpg it delivers.

    "Sweat is what makes it rock and roll, otherwise it is just folk music with drums"

  • EricM

    April 5, 2011 7:58 p.m. EricM Dork

    yes,

    I am thinking about dumping my current car (gets 16 mgp mixed driving) for one that gets 25+ or better mixed driving.

    Also one that can do it on 87 not 93 like the one I have now.

    It is also my DD and shared with my 17 y.o. son, so a few extra mpgs will make a difference

    1991 Audi 90 Quattro 20V

  • mad_machine

    April 5, 2011 8:12 p.m. mad_machine SuperDork

    and here I am thinking my Saab gets bad miliage at 25mpg....

    Mercenary Stage Hand: When the money's gone, so am I.

  • Hal

    April 5, 2011 8:18 p.m. Hal Dork

    <--- My "fun" car was originally bought to be my DD and fuel economy was part of the decision. Even though it is no longer my DD and has been highly modified it will still get over 30 mpg on the highway.

    2010 Transit Connect XLT 2001 Ford Focus with a little help from Powerworks

  • novaderrik

    April 5, 2011 8:28 p.m. novaderrik HalfDork

    i always try to get max fuel economy out of whatever i own. i'm weird like that.

  • Ian F

    April 5, 2011 8:38 p.m. Ian F SuperDork

    mad_machine wrote: and here I am thinking my Saab gets bad miliage at 25mpg....

    Yeah... I complain when I have to drive our '07 Cooper to work, since it "only" gets 35 mpg... Having a TDI tends to skew ones opinion about good mileage.

    I'll admit I did think about gas mileage when I was thinking about toy cars last year... and sort of met in the middle with the E30.

  • njansenv

    April 5, 2011 8:43 p.m. njansenv HalfDork

    Ian F wrote:
    mad_machine wrote: and here I am thinking my Saab gets bad miliage at 25mpg....

    Yeah... I complain when I have to drive our '07 Cooper to work, since it "only" gets 35 mpg... Having a TDI tends to skew ones opinion about good mileage.

    I'll admit I did think about gas mileage when I was thinking about toy cars last year... and sort of met in the middle with the E30.

    True enough: I pondered commuting (100 miles/day) in a Miata, until I realized that it would nearly double my fuel bill. The TDI is uninspiring, but it sure is cheap to run.

    It matters to me these days: I want a fun car that I can occasionally take to work or go for a long drive with the family without thinking twice. I expect that less than 25mpg (highway) is just about a deal breaker for me. Newish V8 cars would generally squeeze in, old carburated muscle...not so much. I couldn't do less than 20mpg, no way.

  • John Brown

    April 5, 2011 8:47 p.m. John Brown SuperDork

    I am with Mr. Hardy on this one. I have access to a second gen RX7 tub, an 87-92 Supra tub, a 3rd gen Camaro and a Fairmont wagon with a SN95 mod motor parts car all technically within my budget if I can find a full time garage to keep it...

    I also found a 4.3 acre lot with a 45x90 and a 100x125 pole barn that I can move Casa Mofo on to as it is zoned right and has an existing Mobile Home foundation for $40K

    Internationally known as The Brown Stig

  • integraguy

    April 5, 2011 9:16 p.m. integraguy Dork

    Since bigger engined/less economical cars tend to also be more expensive to buy, my "fun" cars have usually been just as fuel miserly as my DD. Tho, if you think about it, if it truely is a "fun" car and therefore isn't used as often as a DD, fuel mileage should be irrelevant.

  • friedgreencorrado

    April 5, 2011 9:26 p.m. friedgreencorrado SuperDork

    My fun cars rotate through the DD position. But they're all pre-95 VWs. Sometimes, when I curse that the Corrados only average about 25mpg, other folks (non-enthusiats with trucks & SUVs) cry. Still, after I find my next job I may go looking for an early TDI. That's if I don't go nutz and find that 1st gen Integra I was talking about on the "cheap car lust" thread.

    How can it be a midlife crisis, when I've driven sportscars my entire life?

  • The_Pirate

    April 5, 2011 10:18 p.m. The_Pirate New Reader

    EricM wrote: yes, I am thinking about dumping my current car (gets 16 mgp mixed driving) for one that gets 25+ or better mixed driving. Also one that can do it on 87 not 93 like the one I have now. It is also my DD and shared with my 17 y.o. son, so a few extra mpgs will make a difference

    The Audi? Yeah, mine is surprisingly thirsty too. The odometer doesn't work, but my best guesstimates put it around 18 mpg. Not a big deal, as I only drive it a couple times a week.

    Don't sell, man. These cars are getting rarer, and yours looks fantastic.

« 1 2 »  

You'll need to log in to post.

konicms
Saferacer
Moroso

Birthdays

Yes or No

What’s your favorite British sports car?

Triumph

45%

MG

13%

Austin Healey

19%

Aston Martin

3%

Jensen / Jensen Healey

3%

TVR

13%

Morgan

3%

Check back soon for the next poll. View all polls