What a great idea a pair of '69 Triumphs on the cover and a comparison of bike & car! No wait! That isn't a classic Bonneville, it's a-a-a REPLICA!! (FAKE)
Yes I read the article about your '64 which you chose not to take. If you want to sell that old out of date shaker complete with bad brakes, drop me a line.
Of course any '64 Triumph I ever rode will stop faster than any 4-wheel conveyance I've driven from that era. But if that wasn't good enough, how about a '68 or later? The Dual Leading Shoe Front Brake brought stopping a Triumph to a whole new level. And you couldn't find a later model T-120TT, T120R, TR-6R, or even a T100R? Even the '73 Norton would be a closer compare than a 41 year newer bike! Not to mention my favorite ride I've ever owned, my 1969 Royal Enfield 750 Interceptor. Now other than getting gasoline on your trousers when you backed off the gas, that was a great ride!

Now that's an adventure. JG, another angle of car vs. bike is home restoration. Both are challenging for sure and bikes are less forgiving if you're work's not up to scratch, but a bike makes a more manageable project for the mechancally (or is it meniacly) inclined. I for one, was happy to see some bike coverage and it was a nice nod to Motorcycle Classics (my only other US magazine subscription).






